Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrick Kypson vs Seong Chan Hong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kypson vs Hong analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Kypson vs Seong Chan Hong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kypson 1 - 0 Hong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kypson has won 53.64% of points on their second serve, while Hong has won 52.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kypson, in recent form, has won 47.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hong has won 51.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.02% and 31.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kypson has saved 64.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hong has saved 60.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kypson has won 58.06% of matches played (W/L 36/ 26), with Hong winning 50% (W/L 35/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kypson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 32/ 15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 67/ 51). Hong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 217/ 112), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Kypson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16), where as Hong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kypson winning 1 times and Hong being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kypson winning 2 and Hong winning 0. The last match between Kypson and Hong was at the Cary 1 Challenger, 10-08-2023, Second, Hard with Patrick Kypson getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kypson and Hong have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kypson winning 0 times and Hong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kypson winning 0, and Hong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kypson has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.35 while Hong has played against players with an average rank of 281.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kypson has won 23% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hong has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kypson has converted 43.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hong has converted 42.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
150
Rank
133
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
191
Rank
172
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
64% (195-112)
Career Total W/L
62% (248-150)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
61% (25-16)
$143,295
Career Prize Money
$84,490
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patrick Kypson | Seong Chan Hong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:13 | 1:32:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (34/56) | 53% (29/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (29/34) | 83% (24/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (14/22) | 50% (13/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (18/55) | 23% (13/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Patrick Kypson
Player
Seong Chan Hong
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrick Kypson | Seong Chan Hong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 61% (25/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (32/29) | 56% (55/44) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (319/294) | 51% (475/449) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 66% (25/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.68 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 205 | 144 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:19 | 1:51:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 227.44 | 305.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1102/1831) | 61% (1768/2885) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (838/1102) | 67% (1179/1768) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (391/729) | 53% (587/1117) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (56/129) | 42% (130/307) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (624/1822) | 40% (1181/2970) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) | 66% (23/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 60% (24/40) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 67% (12/18) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 90% (21/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 10% (21/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 30% (20/6) |
Patrick Kypson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Patrick Kypson
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Patrick Kypson
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Patrick Kypson
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Brandon Holt
44%
(
8 of
18)
1st Serve %
87%
(
13 of
15)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Seong Chan Hong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Seong Chan Hong
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Murphy Cassone
45%
(
39 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
36%
(
17 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Seong Chan Hong
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Seong Chan Hong
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Blake Ellis
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Moez Echargui
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Seong Chan Hong
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kypson Vs Hong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
